Altman Z″
Needs withheld for this sector: Built on manufacturers' working capital and asset turnover; a lender always looks distressed on it..
This is a lending business. Cash-flow reads that suit a manufacturer do not apply: disbursing loans is an operating outflow, so negative operating cash is normal and not a warning sign. Leverage is the raw material of the model, not a red flag on its own. Reads that would mislead here have been withheld rather than shown with a caveat.
This company listed within the last twelve months, so its prospectus is still the primary source. The figures below were extracted from the DRHP and RHP before listing and scored then, and they are shown here as they stand in the IPO record rather than restated.
How the book filled. A category that bid far above the rest is a different signal from a uniformly covered issue.
Trading at 31.1x earnings against its own median of 31.3x: 0.1 standard deviations below its usual range. This compares the company with its own history, not with other companies.
How to read this: Price shows the closing price with its 50-day (amber) and 200-day (grey) averages; bars at the bottom are daily volume, green on up days and red on down days; dashed lines mark the 52-week high and low. vs Nifty 50 starts both at 100 so you can see which did better over the period. P/E shows what the market paid for each rupee of profit, inside the band it usually trades in. Drawdown shows how far below its best price the share has been. Hover anywhere for the numbers on that day.
What the numbers mean when read together — computed from the filings, not a score.
Net margin has narrowed from 22.5% to 18.6% year-on-year — profitability per rupee of sales is shrinking.
Why this reading: Noted with caution — worth watching, but not yet conclusive on its own. Business has ups and downs; one soft reading is not a verdict.
Quarter net margin 18.6% vs 22.5% four quarters earlier. Sustained compression signals pricing pressure, cost inflation, or mix deterioration.
Borrowings have fallen 69% over two years — the balance sheet is getting lighter.
Why this reading: A positive signal in the numbers, shown for balance alongside the concerns.
Borrowings down to ₹153 cr from ₹492 cr. Falling debt reduces finance cost and financial risk.
Every score below is calculated here from the reported numbers — none of it is asserted. Open the notebook at the foot of the section to see each formula with this company's figures in it.
Needs withheld for this sector: Built on manufacturers' working capital and asset turnover; a lender always looks distressed on it..
Needs withheld for this sector: Five of its nine tests (cash flow, accruals, current ratio, leverage, asset turnover) mislead on a lending balance sheet..
Needs withheld for this sector: Its receivable, margin and accrual terms do not describe a lender's accounts..
Accruals are 3.5% of assets.
DuPont decomposition — Devised inside the DuPont Corporation in the 1920s and still the standard way to read a return on equity.
Splits return on equity into its three sources, so the same headline number can be traced to very different businesses.
How to read itA 20% ROE built on margin and turnover is a different proposition from a 20% ROE built on 3× leverage. The first survives a downturn; the second amplifies it.
Where it failsA single year. Negative equity makes it meaningless. Leverage is structural for lenders, so the third term carries no signal there.
cumulative operating cash flow ÷ cumulative net profit
₹801 cr ÷ ₹784 cr, over 3 years
1.02×
Above 1.0 means cash exceeds reported profit — the healthier reading.(net profit − operating cash flow) ÷ average total assets
(₹253 − ₹208) cr ÷ average assets
3.5%
The share of profit that is accounting entries rather than cash. Above ~10% is where accruals start to dominate.net margin × asset turnover × leverage
19.1% × 1.14 × 1.47
32.0%
Splits ROE into whether returns come from operations or from borrowing.EBIT ÷ finance cost
₹397 cr ÷ ₹48 cr
8.27×
How many times operating profit covers the interest bill.borrowings ÷ net worth
₹153 cr ÷ ₹791 cr
0.19×
Read against the sector — infrastructure carries more than software.Needs more balance-sheet detail (only 3 of 6 flags testable).
NOPAT over equity plus debt less cash, at a notional 25% tax. Incremental ROIC is the return on money put in since then — the number that decides whether growth creates value or consumes it.
Return on invested capital, and incremental ROIC — Standard in corporate finance; the incremental form was popularised by Michael Mauboussin as the test of whether growth creates value.
ROIC measures what the business earns on all the capital it employs — equity plus debt, less cash. Incremental ROIC asks a sharper question: what has it earned on the money put in since a chosen year?
How to read itROIC comfortably above the cost of capital — call it 11–13% in India — means growth compounds. Below it, growth consumes. Incremental below headline means recent investment is earning less than the legacy business.
Where it failsDistorted in the year of a large acquisition. Understated for companies mid-build, where capital is deployed but capacity has not yet been commissioned — an incubator will look poor until it does not.
The growth rate that makes today's market value equal the discounted cash flows, at a 11.5% discount rate and 4.0% terminal growth. Not a forecast — the arithmetic of what is already in the price. Compare it with what the business has actually delivered.
Reverse DCF — the growth already in the price — A standard inversion of discounted cash flow, used to avoid the forecasting problem entirely.
Instead of forecasting cash flows and deriving a value, it takes today's market value as given and solves for the growth rate that would justify it. The output is not a view — it is the arithmetic of what the market is currently assuming.
How to read itCompare it with what the business has actually delivered. A price implying 30% a year against a decade of 15% is a demanding assumption; the reverse is a modest one.
Where it failsUseless when free cash flow is negative or unusually depressed, which is common mid-capex. Highly sensitive to the discount rate — a point either way moves the answer materially.
Against a policy rate near 6%, most sound Indian corporates borrow between 7% and 10%.
Cost of debt — Interest expense over average borrowings — the effective rate the company actually pays.
What the lenders charge, which is a market verdict on credit quality that no rating agency delay affects.
How to read itAgainst a policy rate near 6%, most sound Indian corporates borrow between 7% and 10%. Read the direction over years as much as the level.
Where it failsUnderstated where a large share of interest is capitalised into projects under construction. Not meaningful for lenders, where interest is cost of goods.
Some figures appear twice on this page with different values. That is not an error — they sit on different bases. The live feed reports a rolling twelve months; everything computed here comes from the last audited statements. Both are shown so you can see which is which.
Where the two disagree, every model, screen and ratio computed on this page uses the filed figure, because the rest of the page is on that basis.
Models that need these lines are withheld rather than estimated: net worth, current assets, current liabilities, trade receivables, inventory, net block. Nothing on this page is back-solved from a figure the company did not publish.
Each framework below is a set of stated, mechanical criteria from published work, run against this company's own filed numbers. Passing or failing a screen is not a verdict — different frameworks disagree by design, and that disagreement is itself informative.
Benjamin Graham's stated criteria for a defensive stock, applied to the filed numbers. A company failing several is not disqualified — Graham designed these to be deliberately strict.
Two ratios only: what the business earns on its capital, and what you pay for those earnings. Designed to be ranked across a universe rather than read in isolation.
The fundamental half of William O'Neil's framework. The market and leadership components are judgement calls and are not scored here.
The characteristics long-term holders commonly look for: cash-backed earnings, high returns on capital, and debt that never forces a decision.
Bars are revenue; the line is net margin. Revenue rising while the line falls is the shape worth noticing.
Operating cash first, then what the business spent and raised.
One year is a snapshot. These are the two lines that matter across a cycle.
Rising debtor or inventory days against flat sales is the earliest visible sign of stress.
Set your own assumptions and watch the numbers move. A scenario calculator — the outputs are the arithmetic of your inputs.
One canonical set of figures — the same numbers used everywhere else on this page and on the screener.
How the register has moved over recent quarters — the direction matters more than the level.
Promoter held steady from 53.92% to 53.92% across these quarters.
FII held steady from 4.27% to 4.27% across these quarters.
MF held steady from 3.59% to 3.59% across these quarters.
Other held steady from 38.22% to 38.22% across these quarters.
What this sector is read on: AUM, AUM growth YoY, Disbursements, NIM or spread, Cost of funds, Stage 2, Gross Stage 3, Net Stage 3. These come from the filings, not the market feed, and appear here once a quarter is read.
Read using the NBFCs and housing finance framework (from the listed sector). Primary valuation lens: P/B against RoA and growth.
Read more closely in this sector: Stage 2 movement against Stage 3 · ALM gap within one year · Write-offs against slippages · Lending to group companies · Unsecured or microfinance growth against the total book.
The shape of the business over time (annual) — read the direction, not the single print.
| Line | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from operations | 1,248 | 1,256 | 1,327 |
| Other income | 20 | 127 | 27 |
| Depreciation | 35 | 55 | 56 |
| Finance cost | 20 | 109 | 48 |
| Profit before tax | 300 | 354 | 349 |
| Net profit (owners) | 249 | 282 | 253 |
| EPS (₹) | 60.24 | 13.65 | 11.40 |
Exceptional items, total income and EBITDA are read from the filed statements.
| Metric | Jun 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 284 | 347 | 409 |
| Other Income | 9 | 9 | 5 |
| Expenses | 197 | 240 | 290 |
| Depreciation | 14 | 16 | 19 |
| Finance cost | 34 | 5 | 4 |
| Profit before tax | 48 | 94 | 102 |
| Net Profit | 34 | 68 | 76 |
| EPS | 1.55 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Item | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 41 | 41 | 44 |
| Reserves | 48 | 263 | 747 |
| Borrowings | 492 | 565 | 153 |
| Net block | 138 | 215 | 352 |
| CWIP | 4 | 12 | 12 |
| Investments | 0 | 172 | 61 |
| Total Assets | 1,103 | 1,410 | 1,161 |
| Line | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from operations | 309 | 284 | 208 |
| Cash from investing | -76 | -586 | 245 |
| Cash from financing | 267 | -173 | -328 |
| Free cash flow | 297 | 219 | 126 |
| Net change in cash | 500 | -475 | 125 |
Cash from operations is the number profit has to answer to. Free cash flow is what remains after the business pays for its own growth.
The same read, applied to the companies this one competes with.
Manipal Payment & Identity Solutions reported total income of ₹409 cr for April to June 2026, +44.0% on the year and +17.9% on the quarter.
Net profit was ₹76.0 cr, +123.5% on the year and +11.8% on the quarter, with earnings per share of ₹3.42.
An NBFC's quarter turns on loan growth, its cost of borrowing and credit costs; profit can rise for a while simply because provisions fall. The quarterly statements do not carry AUM growth, stage 2 and 3 assets, credit cost and the cost of funds; those come with the filing read.
Written from the quarterly statements. The filing read adds the balance sheet and cash flow, the auditor's review, segment results, one-off items line by line and what management said on the call.
No check fired. That is a statement about the checks below, not a verdict on the company.
Could not run on this quarter: Exceptional items that recur, Auditor's review or audit report, IPO money used as stated, Related-party transactions, Exits, postponements, restatements, Promoter pledges and allotments, Earlier promises against delivery, When the results were filed, Asset quality (lenders), Net interest margin (lenders), Net interest income against profit (lenders). Most need the filing read (balance sheet, cash flow, auditor, disclosures).
Net profit a year ago, each driver's change, and net profit now. Blue added profit, red took it away.
Lenders are read on NIM, asset quality, provision cover and credit cost. Those come from the filing read, which is not in yet for this quarter, so margin, other-income and cash checks are withheld rather than shown on a template built for manufacturers.
| Q1 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total income | ₹284 cr | ₹347 cr | ₹409 cr |
| YoY | — | — | +44% |
| Exceptional items | — | — | — |
| Tax rate | 28% | 28% | 26% |
| Net profit | ₹34.0 cr | ₹68.0 cr | ₹76.0 cr |
| YoY | — | — | +124% |
| EPS | ₹1.55 | ₹3.07 | ₹3.42 |
| Flags | · | · | ✓ |
Each quarter is read with the same rules. Balance-sheet and cash checks run on half-year and annual quarters; filing-read checks run where a read exists.