Altman Z″
Needs current assets and current liabilities.
A plain-language read of the business, how it actually earns, where the edge is, and the economics of every reported segment — taken from the annual report and investor presentation, not a one-line industry label.
Trading at 113.9x earnings against its own median of 79.9x: 1.3 standard deviations above its usual range. This compares the company with its own history, not with other companies.
How to read this: Price shows the closing price with its 50-day (amber) and 200-day (grey) averages; bars at the bottom are daily volume, green on up days and red on down days; dashed lines mark the 52-week high and low. vs Nifty 50 starts both at 100 so you can see which did better over the period. P/E shows what the market paid for each rupee of profit, inside the band it usually trades in. Drawdown shows how far below its best price the share has been. Hover anywhere for the numbers on that day.
The three to six things that actually matter about this company, each with the exact filing and note it came from — never a fact without the context that makes it meaningful.
What the numbers mean when read together — computed from the filings, not a score.
Operating cash is 82% of trailing profit — a modest gap worth keeping an eye on.
Why this reading: Noted with caution: a mild gap that is commonly benign (working-capital timing) but worth tracking across years.
Operating cash ₹165 cr vs trailing profit ₹202 cr. Gaps in the 0.5–0.9 range are usually timing, occasionally a early tell.
Borrowings rose 38% over two years while the company also carries ₹917 cr in investments. Why borrow at interest while parking money elsewhere is a fair question.
Why this reading: Noted with caution — worth watching, but not yet conclusive on its own. Business has ups and downs; one soft reading is not a verdict.
Borrowings moved to ₹33 cr from ₹24 cr. Simultaneous large investments can be legitimate treasury management, or a sign that reported cash is not freely available.
Debt rose over 3 years, and most of it (3117%) has turned into fixed assets and projects under construction — the borrowing is building the business.
Why this reading: A positive signal: leverage taken on is visibly becoming productive capacity, not disappearing.
New borrowing ₹12 cr largely matched by an asset build of ₹374 cr. Debt that funds capacity is a different thing from debt that funds nothing.
Both revenue and profit grew over the last year (22.9% and 7%) — growth is translating to the bottom line.
Why this reading: A positive signal in the numbers, shown for balance alongside the concerns.
Trailing revenue ₹1,112 cr, trailing profit ₹199 cr. Profit growing at least as fast as revenue indicates operating leverage or pricing power.
Free cash flow is positive and consistent — the business funds itself after capex.
Why this reading: A positive signal in the numbers, shown for balance alongside the concerns.
Latest free cash flow ₹142 cr. Negative in only 0 of 8 years. A self-funding business needs less external capital and dilutes less.
Every score below is calculated here from the reported numbers — none of it is asserted. Open the notebook at the foot of the section to see each formula with this company's figures in it.
Needs current assets and current liabilities.
Piotroski F-Score — fundamental momentum — Joseph Piotroski, University of Chicago, 2000, in a study of whether accounting signals could improve returns among cheap stocks.
Nine yes-or-no tests across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency. Each pass scores one. It asks a narrow question: is this business getting better or worse on its own terms, year over year?
How to read it7 or more suggests improving fundamentals; 3 or fewer suggests deterioration. It measures direction, not quality — a weak company improving can score higher than a strong one holding steady.
Where it failsA single year of comparison, so one unusual year distorts it. Says nothing about valuation, competitive position or management. Piotroski designed it to rank already-cheap stocks, not to judge a company in isolation.
Needs trade receivables, current assets, other expenses.
Accruals are 1.9% of assets. Free cash flow negative in 0 of 8 years.
DuPont decomposition — Devised inside the DuPont Corporation in the 1920s and still the standard way to read a return on equity.
Splits return on equity into its three sources, so the same headline number can be traced to very different businesses.
How to read itA 20% ROE built on margin and turnover is a different proposition from a 20% ROE built on 3× leverage. The first survives a downturn; the second amplifies it.
Where it failsA single year. Negative equity makes it meaningless. Leverage is structural for lenders, so the third term carries no signal there.
Capital is going in far faster than revenue is coming out. For a business mid-build that is expected — the test is whether it converts.
cumulative operating cash flow ÷ cumulative net profit
₹811 cr ÷ ₹1,043 cr, over 8 years
0.78×
Below 1.0 and persistent means profit is being recognised before the cash arrives.(net profit − operating cash flow) ÷ average total assets
(₹202 − ₹165) cr ÷ average assets
1.9%
The share of profit that is accounting entries rather than cash. Above ~10% is where accruals start to dominate.net margin × asset turnover × leverage
19.1% × 0.51 × 1.19
11.5%
Splits ROE into whether returns come from operations or from borrowing.EBIT ÷ finance cost
₹271 cr ÷ ₹10 cr
27.10×
How many times operating profit covers the interest bill.borrowings ÷ net worth
₹33 cr ÷ ₹1,756 cr
0.02×
Read against the sector — infrastructure carries more than software.growth in fixed assets + CWIP, against growth in revenue
capital +1,626% vs revenue +97%, FY2023 to FY2026
1,529pp gap
Money going in far faster than revenue coming out. For an incubator this is expected — the test is whether it eventually converts.Needs more balance-sheet detail (only 3 of 6 flags testable).
NOPAT over equity plus debt less cash, at a notional 25% tax. Incremental ROIC is the return on money put in since then — the number that decides whether growth creates value or consumes it.
Return on invested capital, and incremental ROIC — Standard in corporate finance; the incremental form was popularised by Michael Mauboussin as the test of whether growth creates value.
ROIC measures what the business earns on all the capital it employs — equity plus debt, less cash. Incremental ROIC asks a sharper question: what has it earned on the money put in since a chosen year?
How to read itROIC comfortably above the cost of capital — call it 11–13% in India — means growth compounds. Below it, growth consumes. Incremental below headline means recent investment is earning less than the legacy business.
Where it failsDistorted in the year of a large acquisition. Understated for companies mid-build, where capital is deployed but capacity has not yet been commissioned — an incubator will look poor until it does not.
Read downward. Cash can cover EBITDA and still not survive capex — the third rung is where a capital-hungry business shows itself.
The earnings quality ladder — Not a named model — the standard sequence an analyst walks when testing whether reported profit is real.
Three ratios read in order, each stricter than the last.
How to read itRead downward. Each rung failing where the one above passed tells you exactly where the cash is going.
Where it failsA single year of heavy capex depresses the third rung legitimately. Judge it across a cycle.
The growth rate that makes today's market value equal the discounted cash flows, at a 11.5% discount rate and 4.0% terminal growth. Not a forecast — the arithmetic of what is already in the price. Compare it with what the business has actually delivered.
Reverse DCF — the growth already in the price — A standard inversion of discounted cash flow, used to avoid the forecasting problem entirely.
Instead of forecasting cash flows and deriving a value, it takes today's market value as given and solves for the growth rate that would justify it. The output is not a view — it is the arithmetic of what the market is currently assuming.
How to read itCompare it with what the business has actually delivered. A price implying 30% a year against a decade of 15% is a demanding assumption; the reverse is a modest one.
Where it failsUseless when free cash flow is negative or unusually depressed, which is common mid-capex. Highly sensitive to the discount rate — a point either way moves the answer materially.
Some figures appear twice on this page with different values. That is not an error — they sit on different bases. The live feed reports a rolling twelve months; everything computed here comes from the last audited statements. Both are shown so you can see which is which.
Where the two disagree, every model, screen and ratio computed on this page uses the filed figure, because the rest of the page is on that basis.
Models that need these lines are withheld rather than estimated: net worth, current assets, current liabilities, trade receivables, inventory, net block. Nothing on this page is back-solved from a figure the company did not publish.
Each framework below is a set of stated, mechanical criteria from published work, run against this company's own filed numbers. Passing or failing a screen is not a verdict — different frameworks disagree by design, and that disagreement is itself informative.
Benjamin Graham's stated criteria for a defensive stock, applied to the filed numbers. A company failing several is not disqualified — Graham designed these to be deliberately strict.
Two ratios only: what the business earns on its capital, and what you pay for those earnings. Designed to be ranked across a universe rather than read in isolation.
The fundamental half of William O'Neil's framework. The market and leadership components are judgement calls and are not scored here.
The characteristics long-term holders commonly look for: cash-backed earnings, high returns on capital, and debt that never forces a decision.
Median of the companies we hold in the same sector (Information Technology). Every figure on both sides is the live feed's trailing twelve months, so the two are measured the same way whatever depth of extraction this company has had. A number only means something next to something else — expensive against the market and cheap against peers are different facts.
Bars are revenue; the line is net margin. Revenue rising while the line falls is the shape worth noticing.
Operating cash first, then what the business spent and raised.
One year is a snapshot. These are the two lines that matter across a cycle.
Rising debtor or inventory days against flat sales is the earliest visible sign of stress.
Set your own assumptions and watch the numbers move. A scenario calculator — the outputs are the arithmetic of your inputs.
One canonical set of figures — the same numbers used everywhere else on this page and on the screener.
How the register has moved over recent quarters — the direction matters more than the level.
Promoter held steady from 65.20% to 65.10% across these quarters.
FII held steady from 2.17% to 2.12% across these quarters.
MF held steady from 2.90% to 2.86% across these quarters.
Other rose from 29.73% to 29.92% across these quarters.
Where cash gets stuck. A rising inventory or debtor line against flat sales is the earliest sign of trouble in the numbers.
| Measure | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor days
How long customers take to pay | 64 | 62 | 73 | 75 | 67 | 64 | 80 | 80 |
| Cash conversion cycle
Debtor + inventory − payable days | 64 | 62 | 73 | 75 | 67 | 64 | 80 | 80 |
| Working capital days | 62 | 72 | 75 | 82 | 76 | 141 | 100 | 34 |
| ROCE %
Return on capital employed | — | 25.0% | 27.0% | 17.0% | 17.0% | 15.0% | 15.0% | 16.0% |
| Metric | Q2 FY27 | Q1 FY27 | Q2 FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBIT margin | 16.48% | 16.42% | 17.76% |
| Revenue Growth QoQ | 2.51% | — | — |
| Revenue Growth YoY | 14.18% | — | — |
| Employee Benefit Expense to Revenue Ratio | 68.86% | 68.66% | 65.2% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 25.9% | 27.86% | 25.91% |
From the quarterly results and the earnings call, read by FinMinutes. Latest quarter, read in full.
Read using the IT services framework (named in the filing read). Primary valuation lens: P/E on constant-currency growth.
Read more closely in this sector: Large deal ramp-downs or client losses named · Pass-through revenue · Onsite and offshore mix shift · Deal TCV against revenue growth.
The shape of the business over time (annual) — read the direction, not the single print.
| Line | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from operations | 306 | 408 | 539 | 641 | 848 | 1,060 |
| Other income | 21 | 44 | 56 | 74 | 69 | 76 |
| Depreciation | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 29 | 41 |
| Finance cost | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| Profit before tax | 116 | 154 | 189 | 197 | 229 | 261 |
| Net profit (owners) | 91 | 130 | 155 | 159 | 173 | 202 |
| EPS (₹) | 112.43 | 6.46 | 7.59 | 7.70 | 8.44 | 9.57 |
Exceptional items, total income and EBITDA are read from the filed statements.
| Metric | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 156 | 166 | 172 | 179 | 209 | 228 | 232 | 236 | 258 | 278 | 289 | 287 |
| Other Income | 17 | 23 | 16 | 17 | 23 | 15 | 21 | 23 | 19 | 18 | 16 | 21 |
| Expenses | 125 | 129 | 131 | 141 | 164 | 178 | 177 | 186 | 201 | 216 | 221 | 230 |
| Depreciation | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 11 |
| Finance cost | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Profit before tax | 45 | 57 | 53 | 52 | 58 | 56 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 67 | 71 | 65 |
| Net Profit | 34 | 47 | 45 | 39 | 41 | 43 | 51 | 51 | 46 | 51 | 55 | 47 |
| EPS | 1.66 | 2.26 | 2.20 | 1.89 | 1.94 | 2.03 | 2.59 | 2.46 | 2.15 | 2.42 | 2.55 | 2.33 |
| Item | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 1 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 21 | 21 |
| Reserves | 437 | 1,006 | 1,187 | 1,354 | 1,479 | 1,735 |
| Borrowings | 52 | 26 | 21 | 24 | 29 | 33 |
| Net block | 30 | 29 | 23 | 28 | 401 | 397 |
| CWIP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
| Investments | 139 | 194 | 501 | 676 | 848 | 917 |
| Total Assets | 519 | 1,100 | 1,263 | 1,456 | 1,789 | 2,083 |
| Line | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from operations | 90 | 87 | 97 | 115 | 130 | 165 |
| Cash from investing | -47 | -435 | -277 | -3 | -221 | -69 |
| Cash from financing | 17 | 449 | -4 | -1 | -5 | -7 |
| Free cash flow | 88 | 81 | 94 | 111 | 115 | 142 |
| Net change in cash | 60 | 102 | -183 | 111 | -95 | 89 |
Cash from operations is the number profit has to answer to. Free cash flow is what remains after the business pays for its own growth.
The part no one reads: the auditor's opinion, the contingent liabilities buried in the notes, the covenants, and the claims in the deck placed beside the figures that test them.
Where analysts pressed management on the earnings call, and exactly how management answered — the questions that were hardest to answer are usually the ones that matter.
These are coverage counts, not ratings. Each one asks a fixed set of questions of the filings and reports how many the company answered. A company that discloses nothing counts nothing here — that is a statement about the disclosure, not about the business.
The same read, applied to the companies this one competes with.
Latent View Analytics Ltd. reported revenue of ₹294 cr for July to September 2026, +14.2% on the year and +2.5% on the quarter. That is slower than this quarter has grown in recent years (+28.6% on average). It is the highest quarterly revenue in the last 12 quarters on record. Over the last four quarters revenue comes to ₹1,148 cr, +20.4% on the four before.
Operating profit (EBITDA) was ₹59.8 cr, a margin of 20.3%, −147 bps on the year and +57 bps on the quarter. Over the last 8 quarters the margin has ranged from 19.8% to 23.7%, averaging 21.8%. Operating costs grew +16.3%, faster than revenue at +14.2%, so operating profit grew less than sales.
Net profit was ₹48.5 cr, +6.0% on the year and +2.9% on the quarter, with earnings per share of ₹2.35. Profit before other income, one-offs and tax grew faster, at +11.0%; other income, one-offs or tax held the headline back. The tax rate of 26% is in line with its recent average. Profit over the last four quarters totals ₹202 cr, +5.7% on the four before.
IT services revenue moves with deal wins, client budgets and the rupee: a part of rupee growth can be currency, which only the constant-currency figure in the filing separates out. Margins move most with wage hikes, utilisation and currency.
On earnings per share of ₹9.65 over the last four quarters, the stock at ₹243.39 trades at 25.2 times trailing earnings.
Less than half the profit turned into operating cash. Working capital, or something else?
Source: Cash flow statement
The auditor drew attention to a matter in the limited review report. Read it before the numbers.
Source: Auditor (p. consolidated auditor report p.2-3)
Filed late at night.
Source: Exchange filing
Could not run on this quarter: Exceptional items that recur, Inventory against sales, IPO money used as stated, Related-party transactions, Promoter pledges and allotments, Earlier promises against delivery. The filing did not carry these lines.
Net profit a year ago, each driver's change, and net profit now. Blue added profit, red took it away.
| Balance sheet | Sep '26 | Last year end | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | ₹247 cr | ₹231 cr | ▲ 6.9% |
| Cash | ₹232 cr | ₹159 cr | ▲ 46.1% |
| Bank balances | ₹107 cr | ₹205 cr | ▼ 47.7% |
| Long-term borrowings | ₹0.0 cr | ₹0.0 cr | ▼ 100.0% |
| Trade payables | ₹20.8 cr | ₹19.8 cr | ▲ 5.3% |
| Net block | ₹49.6 cr | ₹56.5 cr | ▼ 12.1% |
| Equity | ₹1,863 cr | ₹1,755 cr | ▲ 6.1% |
| Total assets | ₹2,156 cr | ₹2,094 cr | ▲ 2.9% |
| Cash flow, year to date | This year | Last year |
|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | ₹25.0 cr | ₹57.4 cr |
| Capital expenditure | ₹4.6 cr | ₹15.3 cr |
| Investing cash flow | ₹49.6 cr | ₹8.4 cr |
| Financing cash flow | −₹3.8 cr | −₹5.4 cr |
Operating cash flow was 0.26× profit. Receivables at 78 days of sales (−2 days against the last year end).
Emphasis of matter: “”We draw attention to Note 5 to the consolidated unaudited financial results, which describes the disagreement between the Holding Company and the selling shareholders of Decision Point Private Limited ("DPPL"), in interpretation of the Share Purchase Agreement ("SPA") dated March… Read in full
We draw attention to Note 5 to the consolidated unaudited financial results, which describes the disagreement between the Holding Company and the selling shareholders of Decision Point Private Limited ("DPPL"), in interpretation of the Share Purchase Agreement ("SPA") dated March 28, 2024, read along with amendment dated July 1, 2024, entered into between the Holding Company and the selling shareholders, relating to the computation of the purchase consideration to be paid by the Holding Company for the proposed acquisition of the remaining 20% equity interest in DPPL and its subsidiaries pursuant to the SPA. Based on management's assessment, which is supported by an external legal opinion obtained by the Holding Company, the outcome of the matter and adjustment in the financial results, if any, is currently not determinable awaiting resolution of the disagreement in accordance with the process set out in the SPA.
Other matter: “”We did not review the interim financial results of a subsidiary (including four step-down subsidiaries) reflect total assets of Rs. 928.12 million and net assets of Rs. 625.73 million as at September 30, 2026 and total revenues of Rs. 493.01… Read in full
We did not review the interim financial results of a subsidiary (including four step-down subsidiaries) reflect total assets of Rs. 928.12 million and net assets of Rs. 625.73 million as at September 30, 2026 and total revenues of Rs. 493.01 million and Rs. 222.87 million, total net loss after tax of Rs. 58.12 million and Rs. 7.04 million and total comprehensive income/(loss) of Rs. (60.97) million and Rs. (8.61) million, for the quarter ended and for the period April 01, 2026 to September 30, 2026, respectively, and cash flows (net) of Rs. 67.88 million for the period from April 01, 2026 to September 30, 2026, as considered in the consolidated unaudited financial results. These interim consolidated financial results have been reviewed by other auditor in accordance with SRE 2410 "Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity" and their reports dated October 27, 2026, vide which they have issued an unmodified conclusion, have been furnished to us by the other auditor and our conclusion on the Statement, in so far as it relates to the amounts and disclosures included in respect of this subsidiary (including four step-down subsidiaries), is based on the reports of the other auditor and the procedures performed by us as stated in paragraph 3 above.
Filing p. consolidated auditor report p.2-3
Reconstitution of the Risk Management Committee w.e.f. October 31, 2026; Mr. Rajan Sethuraman ceases to be a member of the Committee. (p. 1, outcome letter)
Legal dispute with selling shareholders of Decision Point Private Limited ('DPPL') regarding purchase consideration for remaining 20% equity interest under SPA. (p. note 5, auditor report p.2)
Tax: Current tax of ₹19.58 crore and deferred tax credit of ₹2.64 crore on Profit before tax of ₹65.41 crore
| Metric | Q2 FY27 | Q1 FY27 | Q2 FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBIT margin | 16.48% | 16.42% | 17.76% |
| Revenue Growth QoQ | 2.51% | — | — |
| Revenue Growth YoY | 14.18% | — | — |
| Employee Benefit Expense to Revenue Ratio | 68.86% | 68.66% | 65.2% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 25.9% | 27.86% | 25.91% |
Worked out from filed numbers. EBIT Margin: EBIT (48.71 crore) / Revenue from operations (294.07 crore) * 100 · Revenue Growth QoQ: (Q2 FY27 Revenue 294.07 - Q1 FY27 Revenue 286.88) / 286.88 * 100 · Revenue Growth YoY: (Q2 FY27 Revenue 294.07 - Q2 FY26 Revenue 257.54) / 257.54 * 100 · PAT Margin: PAT (48.47 crore) / Revenue from operations (294.07 crore) * 100
Read using the IT services framework (named in the filing read). Primary valuation lens: P/E on constant-currency growth.
Read more closely in this sector: Large deal ramp-downs or client losses named · Pass-through revenue · Onsite and offshore mix shift · Deal TCV against revenue growth.
| Segment | Revenue | YoY | Result | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analytics Solutions | ₹294 cr | ▲ 14.2% | ₹65.4 cr | ▲ 6.0% |
| Q3 FY24 | Q4 FY24 | Q1 FY25 | Q2 FY25 | Q3 FY25 | Q4 FY25 | Q1 FY26 | Q2 FY26 | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | Q2 FY27 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹166 cr | ₹172 cr | ₹179 cr | ₹209 cr | ₹228 cr | ₹232 cr | ₹236 cr | ₹258 cr | ₹278 cr | ₹289 cr | ₹287 cr | ₹294 cr |
| YoY | — | — | +21% | +34% | +37% | +35% | +32% | +23% | +22% | +25% | +22% | +14% |
| EBITDA margin | 22.3% | 23.3% | 21.2% | 21.5% | 21.9% | 23.7% | 21.2% | 21.8% | 22.3% | 23.5% | 19.8% | 20.3% |
| Other income, % of PBT | 40% | 30% | 33% | 40% | 27% | 34% | 37% | 30% | 27% | 23% | 33% | 27% |
| Exceptional items | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tax rate | 18% | 15% | 25% | 30% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 26% | 24% | 22% | 28% | 26% |
| Net profit | ₹47.0 cr | ₹45.0 cr | ₹39.0 cr | ₹41.0 cr | ₹43.0 cr | ₹51.0 cr | ₹51.0 cr | ₹45.7 cr | ₹51.0 cr | ₹55.0 cr | ₹47.1 cr | ₹48.5 cr |
| YoY | — | — | +18% | +21% | −9% | +13% | +31% | +12% | +19% | +8% | −8% | +6% |
| Core profit YoY | — | — | +40% | +25% | +21% | +11% | +11% | +23% | +20% | +34% | +13% | +11% |
| EPS | ₹2.26 | ₹2.20 | ₹1.89 | ₹1.94 | ₹2.03 | ₹2.59 | ₹2.46 | ₹2.15 | ₹2.42 | ₹2.55 | ₹2.33 | ₹2.35 |
| Flags | 1 | 1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 2 |
Each quarter is read with the same rules. Balance-sheet and cash checks run on half-year and annual quarters; filing-read checks run where a read exists.