Altman Z″
Needs current assets and current liabilities.
A plain-language read of the business, how it actually earns, where the edge is, and the economics of every reported segment — taken from the annual report and investor presentation, not a one-line industry label.
Trading at 65.1x earnings against its own median of 60.1x: 0.1 standard deviations above its usual range. This compares the company with its own history, not with other companies.
How to read this: Price shows the closing price with its 50-day (amber) and 200-day (grey) averages; bars at the bottom are daily volume, green on up days and red on down days; dashed lines mark the 52-week high and low. vs Nifty 50 starts both at 100 so you can see which did better over the period. P/E shows what the market paid for each rupee of profit, inside the band it usually trades in. Drawdown shows how far below its best price the share has been. Hover anywhere for the numbers on that day.
The three to six things that actually matter about this company, each with the exact filing and note it came from — never a fact without the context that makes it meaningful.
What the numbers mean when read together — computed from the filings, not a score.
Over the last year profit declined 16.6% even as revenue grew 12.7% — margins are compressing, and any premium being paid rests on a year that moved backwards on the bottom line.
Why this reading: Flagged because the pattern is clear, material, and not explained by the visible numbers — the kind of thing worth understanding before anything else.
Trailing revenue ₹1,611 cr (up 12.7%) but trailing profit ₹493 cr (down 16.6%). Rising sales with falling profit points to cost inflation not passed through, mix shift to lower-margin lines, or one-off gains in the base year.
Net margin has narrowed from 46.8% to 30.6% year-on-year — profitability per rupee of sales is shrinking.
Why this reading: Noted with caution — worth watching, but not yet conclusive on its own. Business has ups and downs; one soft reading is not a verdict.
Quarter net margin 30.6% vs 46.8% four quarters earlier. Sustained compression signals pricing pressure, cost inflation, or mix deterioration.
Operating cash is 146% of trailing profit — the earnings are converting to real cash, not just accruals.
Why this reading: A positive signal: cash conversion at or above ~0.9 means reported profit is showing up as actual cash.
Operating cash ₹694 cr against trailing net profit ₹475 cr. Consistent conversion near or above 1.0 is a hallmark of genuine earnings.
Borrowings have fallen 44% over two years — the balance sheet is getting lighter.
Why this reading: A positive signal in the numbers, shown for balance alongside the concerns.
Borrowings down to ₹23 cr from ₹41 cr. Falling debt reduces finance cost and financial risk.
Free cash flow swings between positive and negative across the cycle.
Why this reading: Surfaced for context, not as a concern — it only becomes meaningful if it persists or pairs with other signals.
Latest ₹687 cr, negative in 2 of 12 years.
Every score below is calculated here from the reported numbers — none of it is asserted. Open the notebook at the foot of the section to see each formula with this company's figures in it.
Needs current assets and current liabilities.
Piotroski F-Score — fundamental momentum — Joseph Piotroski, University of Chicago, 2000, in a study of whether accounting signals could improve returns among cheap stocks.
Nine yes-or-no tests across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency. Each pass scores one. It asks a narrow question: is this business getting better or worse on its own terms, year over year?
How to read it7 or more suggests improving fundamentals; 3 or fewer suggests deterioration. It measures direction, not quality — a weak company improving can score higher than a strong one holding steady.
Where it failsA single year of comparison, so one unusual year distorts it. Says nothing about valuation, competitive position or management. Piotroski designed it to rank already-cheap stocks, not to judge a company in isolation.
Needs trade receivables, current assets, other expenses.
Accruals are -5.0% of assets. Free cash flow negative in 2 of 12 years.
DuPont decomposition — Devised inside the DuPont Corporation in the 1920s and still the standard way to read a return on equity.
Splits return on equity into its three sources, so the same headline number can be traced to very different businesses.
How to read itA 20% ROE built on margin and turnover is a different proposition from a 20% ROE built on 3× leverage. The first survives a downturn; the second amplifies it.
Where it failsA single year. Negative equity makes it meaningless. Leverage is structural for lenders, so the third term carries no signal there.
Revenue grew faster than the capital behind it, which is what operating leverage looks like: the existing asset base is working harder.
cumulative operating cash flow ÷ cumulative net profit
₹3,722 cr ÷ ₹2,232 cr, over 12 years
1.67×
Above 1.0 means cash exceeds reported profit — the healthier reading.(net profit − operating cash flow) ÷ average total assets
(₹475 − ₹694) cr ÷ average assets
-5.0%
Negative means cash exceeded profit — the healthier reading. Positive above ~10% is where accruals start to dominate earnings.net margin × asset turnover × leverage
30.3% × 0.34 × 1.93
19.8%
Splits ROE into whether returns come from operations or from borrowing.EBIT ÷ finance cost
₹651 cr ÷ ₹3 cr
217.00×
How many times operating profit covers the interest bill.borrowings ÷ net worth
₹23 cr ÷ ₹2,400 cr
0.01×
Read against the sector — infrastructure carries more than software.growth in fixed assets + CWIP, against growth in revenue
capital +-11% vs revenue +59%, FY2023 to FY2026
-70pp gap
Money going in far faster than revenue coming out. For an incubator this is expected — the test is whether it eventually converts.Needs more balance-sheet detail (only 3 of 6 flags testable).
NOPAT over equity plus debt less cash, at a notional 25% tax. Incremental ROIC is the return on money put in since then — the number that decides whether growth creates value or consumes it.
Return on invested capital, and incremental ROIC — Standard in corporate finance; the incremental form was popularised by Michael Mauboussin as the test of whether growth creates value.
ROIC measures what the business earns on all the capital it employs — equity plus debt, less cash. Incremental ROIC asks a sharper question: what has it earned on the money put in since a chosen year?
How to read itROIC comfortably above the cost of capital — call it 11–13% in India — means growth compounds. Below it, growth consumes. Incremental below headline means recent investment is earning less than the legacy business.
Where it failsDistorted in the year of a large acquisition. Understated for companies mid-build, where capital is deployed but capacity has not yet been commissioned — an incubator will look poor until it does not.
Read downward. Cash can cover EBITDA and still not survive capex — the third rung is where a capital-hungry business shows itself.
The earnings quality ladder — Not a named model — the standard sequence an analyst walks when testing whether reported profit is real.
Three ratios read in order, each stricter than the last.
How to read itRead downward. Each rung failing where the one above passed tells you exactly where the cash is going.
Where it failsA single year of heavy capex depresses the third rung legitimately. Judge it across a cycle.
The growth rate that makes today's market value equal the discounted cash flows, at a 11.5% discount rate and 4.0% terminal growth. Not a forecast — the arithmetic of what is already in the price. Compare it with what the business has actually delivered.
Reverse DCF — the growth already in the price — A standard inversion of discounted cash flow, used to avoid the forecasting problem entirely.
Instead of forecasting cash flows and deriving a value, it takes today's market value as given and solves for the growth rate that would justify it. The output is not a view — it is the arithmetic of what the market is currently assuming.
How to read itCompare it with what the business has actually delivered. A price implying 30% a year against a decade of 15% is a demanding assumption; the reverse is a modest one.
Where it failsUseless when free cash flow is negative or unusually depressed, which is common mid-capex. Highly sensitive to the discount rate — a point either way moves the answer materially.
Models that need these lines are withheld rather than estimated: net worth, current assets, current liabilities, trade receivables, inventory, net block. Nothing on this page is back-solved from a figure the company did not publish.
Each framework below is a set of stated, mechanical criteria from published work, run against this company's own filed numbers. Passing or failing a screen is not a verdict — different frameworks disagree by design, and that disagreement is itself informative.
Benjamin Graham's stated criteria for a defensive stock, applied to the filed numbers. A company failing several is not disqualified — Graham designed these to be deliberately strict.
Two ratios only: what the business earns on its capital, and what you pay for those earnings. Designed to be ranked across a universe rather than read in isolation.
The fundamental half of William O'Neil's framework. The market and leadership components are judgement calls and are not scored here.
The characteristics long-term holders commonly look for: cash-backed earnings, high returns on capital, and debt that never forces a decision.
Median of the companies we hold in the same sector (Consumer Services). Every figure on both sides is the live feed's trailing twelve months, so the two are measured the same way whatever depth of extraction this company has had. A number only means something next to something else — expensive against the market and cheap against peers are different facts.
Bars are revenue; the line is net margin. Revenue rising while the line falls is the shape worth noticing.
Operating cash first, then what the business spent and raised.
One year is a snapshot. These are the two lines that matter across a cycle.
Rising debtor or inventory days against flat sales is the earliest visible sign of stress.
Set your own assumptions and watch the numbers move. A scenario calculator — the outputs are the arithmetic of your inputs.
One canonical set of figures — the same numbers used everywhere else on this page and on the screener.
How the register has moved over recent quarters — the direction matters more than the level.
Promoter held steady from 49.17% to 49.07% across these quarters.
FII trimmed from 21.53% to 19.92% across these quarters.
MF trimmed from 11.61% to 10.44% across these quarters.
Other rose from 17.69% to 20.57% across these quarters.
Where cash gets stuck. A rising inventory or debtor line against flat sales is the earliest sign of trouble in the numbers.
| Measure | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor days
How long customers take to pay | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Cash conversion cycle
Debtor + inventory − payable days | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Working capital days | -277 | -266 | -246 | -289 | -305 | -311 | -305 | -301 |
| ROCE %
Return on capital employed | — | 84.0% | 39.0% | 22.0% | 19.0% | 24.0% | 34.0% | 28.0% |
The shape of the business over time (annual) — read the direction, not the single print.
| Line | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from operations | 670 | 753 | 985 | 1,197 | 1,388 | 1,569 |
| Other income | 87 | 112 | 181 | 209 | 272 | 204 |
| Depreciation | 16 | 12 | 31 | 36 | 33 | 28 |
| Finance cost | 7 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 3 |
| Profit before tax | 389 | 390 | 371 | 454 | 706 | 648 |
| Net profit (owners) | 280 | 298 | 284 | 334 | 551 | 475 |
| EPS (₹) | 46.09 | 48.71 | 46.38 | 55.68 | 91.73 | 79.00 |
Exceptional items, total income and EBITDA are read from the filed statements.
| Metric | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 295 | 305 | 315 | 331 | 348 | 354 | 355 | 372 | 391 | 402 | 404 | 414 |
| Other Income | 35 | 42 | 77 | 53 | 66 | 45 | 109 | 92 | 10 | 135 | -34 | 107 |
| Expenses | 226 | 227 | 238 | 223 | 226 | 230 | 236 | 253 | 275 | 282 | 284 | 282 |
| Depreciation | 8 | 8 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Finance cost | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Profit before tax | 93 | 110 | 139 | 151 | 177 | 159 | 218 | 204 | 119 | 247 | 78 | 232 |
| Net Profit | 69 | 82 | 100 | 114 | 135 | 121 | 181 | 154 | 83 | 188 | 50 | 172 |
| EPS | 11.57 | 13.65 | 16.61 | 19.01 | 22.52 | 20.16 | 30.08 | 25.57 | 13.78 | 31.34 | 8.35 | 28.63 |
| Item | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 30 | 31 | 31 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Reserves | 1,581 | 1,844 | 2,028 | 1,676 | 2,125 | 2,340 |
| Borrowings | 63 | 56 | 46 | 41 | 33 | 23 |
| Net block | 65 | 56 | 553 | 536 | 515 | 494 |
| CWIP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Investments | 2,254 | 2,722 | 2,784 | 2,746 | 3,453 | 3,792 |
| Total Assets | 2,511 | 2,949 | 3,442 | 3,449 | 4,130 | 4,625 |
| Line | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from operations | 322 | 402 | 476 | 559 | 623 | 694 |
| Cash from investing | -1,338 | -335 | -324 | 162 | -486 | -347 |
| Cash from financing | 1,038 | -58 | -143 | -695 | -148 | -340 |
| Free cash flow | 323 | 398 | 460 | 545 | 615 | 687 |
| Net change in cash | 23 | 9 | 9 | 27 | -11 | 7 |
Cash from operations is the number profit has to answer to. Free cash flow is what remains after the business pays for its own growth.
The part no one reads: the auditor's opinion, the contingent liabilities buried in the notes, the covenants, and the claims in the deck placed beside the figures that test them.
Where analysts pressed management on the earnings call, and exactly how management answered — the questions that were hardest to answer are usually the ones that matter.
These are coverage counts, not ratings. Each one asks a fixed set of questions of the filings and reports how many the company answered. A company that discloses nothing counts nothing here — that is a statement about the disclosure, not about the business.
The same read, applied to the companies this one competes with.
Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. reported revenue of ₹414 cr for April to June 2026, +11.3% on the year and +2.5% on the quarter. That is slower than this quarter has grown in recent years (+14.9% on average). It is the highest quarterly revenue in the last 12 quarters on record. Over the last four quarters revenue comes to ₹1,611 cr, +12.7% on the four before.
Operating profit (EBITDA) was ₹132 cr, a margin of 31.9%, −11 bps on the year and +218 bps on the quarter. Over the last 8 quarters the margin has ranged from 29.7% to 35.1%, averaging 32.1%. Operating costs grew +11.5%, broadly with revenue, so operating profit kept pace with sales.
Net profit was ₹172 cr, +11.7% on the year and +244.0% on the quarter, with earnings per share of ₹28.63. Profit before other income, one-offs and tax grew 11.6%, so the profit growth came from the business itself. The tax rate of 26% is in line with its recent average. Profit over the last four quarters totals ₹493 cr, −16.6% on the four before.
On earnings per share of ₹82.10 over the last four quarters, the stock at ₹1,630.40 trades at 19.9 times trailing earnings.
Written from the quarterly statements. The filing read adds the balance sheet and cash flow, the auditor's review, segment results, one-off items line by line and what management said on the call.
Depreciation fell while the business grew. Were asset lives changed?
Source: Quarterly statements
Could not run on this quarter: Exceptional items that recur, Cash behind the profit, Receivables against sales, Inventory against sales, Borrowing while holding cash, Auditor's review or audit report, IPO money used as stated, Related-party transactions, Exits, postponements, restatements, Promoter pledges and allotments, Earlier promises against delivery, When the results were filed. Most need the filing read (balance sheet, cash flow, auditor, disclosures).
Net profit a year ago, each driver's change, and net profit now. Blue added profit, red took it away.
| Q2 FY24 | Q3 FY24 | Q4 FY24 | Q1 FY25 | Q2 FY25 | Q3 FY25 | Q4 FY25 | Q1 FY26 | Q2 FY26 | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹295 cr | ₹305 cr | ₹315 cr | ₹331 cr | ₹348 cr | ₹354 cr | ₹355 cr | ₹372 cr | ₹391 cr | ₹402 cr | ₹404 cr | ₹414 cr |
| YoY | — | — | — | +17% | +18% | +16% | +13% | +12% | +12% | +14% | +14% | +11% |
| EBITDA margin | 23.4% | 25.6% | 24.4% | 32.6% | 35.1% | 35.0% | 33.5% | 32.0% | 29.7% | 29.9% | 29.7% | 31.9% |
| Other income, % of PBT | 38% | 38% | 55% | 35% | 37% | 28% | 50% | 45% | 8% | 55% | −44% | 46% |
| Exceptional items | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tax rate | 26% | 25% | 28% | 25% | 24% | 24% | 17% | 25% | 30% | 24% | 36% | 26% |
| Net profit | ₹69.0 cr | ₹82.0 cr | ₹100 cr | ₹114 cr | ₹135 cr | ₹121 cr | ₹181 cr | ₹154 cr | ₹83.0 cr | ₹188 cr | ₹50.0 cr | ₹172 cr |
| YoY | — | — | — | +37% | +96% | +48% | +81% | +35% | −39% | +55% | −72% | +12% |
| Core profit YoY | — | — | — | +72% | +91% | +68% | +76% | +14% | −2% | −2% | +3% | +12% |
| EPS | ₹11.57 | ₹13.65 | ₹16.61 | ₹19.01 | ₹22.52 | ₹20.16 | ₹30.08 | ₹25.57 | ₹13.78 | ₹31.34 | ₹8.35 | ₹28.63 |
| Flags | 1 | 1 | 1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
Each quarter is read with the same rules. Balance-sheet and cash checks run on half-year and annual quarters; filing-read checks run where a read exists.